Michael Darren Bell of Rochester, New York, a stockbroker registered with Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, is the subject of a customer initiated investment related written complaint on June 27, 2017, alleging that between June of 2014 and March of 2017, mutual fund trades were effected in the customer’s account without authorization.

Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Public Disclosure reveals that Bell has been identified in six more customer initiated investment related disputes pertaining to allegations of his improper conduct while registered with Morgan Stanley. In particular, a customer was awarded $40,000.00 in damages according to an investment related arbitration claim involving Bell’s activities, based upon findings that Bell executed unauthorized and unsuitable mutual fund trades, breached his fiduciary duties, and negligently handled the customer’s portfolio. National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) Arbitration No. 05-03145 (Sept. 21, 2006).

On October 6, 2006, another customer initiated investment related written complaint pertaining to Bell’s conduct was settled for $25,000.00 in damages supported by accusations that Bell effected unsuitable mutual funds transactions and failed to abide by the customer’s investment instructions. Afterward, a customer initiated investment related arbitration claim regarding Bell’s activities was resolved for $69,000.00 in damages founded on allegations of misrepresentation and suitability concerning mutual funds investments. NASD Arbitration No. 05-034444 (Nov. 27, 2006).

Then, a customer initiated investment related arbitration claim involving Bell’s conduct was settled for $22,500.00 in damages based upon allegations that Bell negligently managed the customer’s assets and made misrepresentations to the customer concerning the customer’s individual retirement account. FINRA Arbitration No. 07-00096 (Sept. 26, 2013). Further, a customer initiated investment related arbitration claim pertaining to Bell’s activities was resolved for $6,805.00 in damages supported by accusations that Bell inappropriately managed the customer’s retirement account, and misrepresented terms and conditions of investing. FINRA Arbitration No. 07-00096 (Oct. 1, 2013).

Bell has been associated with five different broker dealers, one of which has been expelled by securities regulators for violation of federal securities laws or is otherwise defunct.

The information contained herein has been obtained from reliable sources however may not be accurate and is not guaranteed by us. Readers are encouraged to undertake their own independent investigation and evaluation of the relevant facts. All claims and allegations are subject to adjudication, decisions may be subject to appeal, and no inference is intended, nor should any inference be made from any information contained herein from any source.

This posting and the information on our website is for general information purposes only. This content should be not considered legal advice, and any responses, comments, e-mails, other communications do not form any attorney client relationship. Attorney Advertisement. See Important Disclaimer

Guiliano Law Group

Our practice is limited to the representation of investors. We accept representation on a contingent fee basis, meaning there is no cost to you unless we make a recovery for you. There is never any charge for a consultation or an evaluation of your claim. For more information, contact us at (877) SEC-ATTY.

For more information concerning common claims against stockbrokers and investment professionals, please visit us at stockbrokerfraud.com

To learn more about FINRA Securities Arbitration, and the legal process, please visit us at securitiesarbitrations.com

Tags: ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Name (required)

Email (will not be published) (required)

Website