Joseph Frederick Eschleman of Sacramento California a stockbroker formerly registered with Wells Fargo Clearing Services LLC has been fined $5,000.00 and suspended from associating with any Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) member in any capacity based upon consenting to findings that Eschleman executed unauthorized trades in customer accounts. Letter of Acceptance Waiver and Consent No. 2017054395501 (Aug. 21, 2018).

According to the AWC, on December 20, 2016, discretion had been exercised by Eschleman in customer GK’s account without written authorization being provided to Eschleman. Apparently, Eschleman sold a security from the customer’s retirement account, and a day later sold three securities from the customers’ trust account. Apparently, the customers verbally discussed Eschleman having authorization to effect transactions; however, this was done in 2015 and August of 2016 – far from the time that the transactions were effected.

The AWC stated that Eschleman was particularly instructed by the management at Wells Fargo that he needed to procure appropriate authorization in order to trade in customers’ account on a discretionary basis. Moreover, Eschleman was informed prior to his discretionary trading in GK’s account that time and price discretion was disallowed by the firm.

The AWC detailed that Eschleman failed to procure written permission from GK and his wife, YK, to trade in the trust account and individual retirement account. Wells Fargo evidently never approved those accounts for purposes of discretionary trading. Consequently, FINRA found that Eschleman’s conduct was violative of FINRA Rule 2010 and NASD Rule 2510(b).

FINRA Public Disclosure confirms that Eschleman has been identified in two customer initiated investment related disputes containing accusations of his misconduct while employed with Wachovia Securities, LLC and Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC. Specifically, on October 29, 2008, a customer filed an investment related complaint regarding Eschleman’s activities in which the customer sought $50,000.00 in damages based upon allegations that transactions were effected in the customers’ accounts that were not suitable for them, which caused them to sustain investment losses.

On May 1, 2014, another customer initiated investment related complaint concerning Eschleman’s activities was resolved for $11,488.14 in damages supported by accusations that misrepresentations had been made to the customer by Eschleman concerning the services for the customer’s account. Apparently the customer was charged the full amount of advisory fees despite Eschleman failing to actively manage the customer’s investments.

Since August 10, 2017, Eschleman has been associated with Purshe Kaplan Sterling Investments.

The information contained herein has been obtained from reliable sources however may not be accurate and is not guaranteed by us. Readers are encouraged to undertake their own independent investigation and evaluation of the relevant facts. All claims and allegations are subject to adjudication, decisions may be subject to appeal, and no inference is intended, nor should any inference be made from any information contained herein from any source.

This posting and the information on our website is for general information purposes only. This content should be not considered legal advice, and any responses, comments, e-mails, other communications do not form any attorney client relationship. Attorney Advertisement. See Important Disclaimer

Guiliano Law Group

Our practice is limited to the representation of investors. Over the last three decades, we have recovered more than a hundred million dollars for more than 1,000 injured investors from all over the United States and several foreign countries. We accept representation purely on a contingent fee basis, meaning there is no cost to you unless we make a recovery for you. There is never any charge for a confidential consultation or an evaluation of your claim. For more information, contact us at (877) SEC-ATTY.

For more information concerning common claims against stockbrokers and investment professionals, please visit us at stockbrokerfraud.com

To learn more about FINRA Securities Arbitration, and the legal process, please visit us at securitiesarbitrations.com

Tags: ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Name (required)

Email (will not be published) (required)

Website