Cabot Lodge Securities LLC a securities broker dealer headquartered in New York New York has been charged by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Department of Enforcement in a Complaint containing allegations that (1) Cabot Lodge failed to supervise a non-traded real estate investment trust initial public offering and (2) the securities broker dealer poorly advised at least one elderly customer in regard to non-traded real estate investment trust transactions. FINRA Department of Enforcement v. Cabot Lodge Securities LLC Disciplinary Proceeding No. 2014041541401 (Jan. 2, 2020).

According to the Complaint, between August of 2012 and February of 2016, Cabot Lodge Securities took part as dealer manager in a non-traded real estate investment trust initial public offering. Allegedly, the organization and offering expenses for this IPO were unreasonable and excessive; and there was a lack of disclosures made to investors in regard to the compensation of the securities broker dealer’s representatives. The Complaint stated that the underwriting and sales processes were not reasonably supervised by the securities broker dealer.

Allegedly, Cabot Lodge Securities personnel disregarded their duties to oversee the organization and offering expenses to ensure compliance with FINRA Rules. The Complaint stated that more than fifteen percent of gross offering proceeds went towards overall organization and offering expenses; and more than ten percent of the proceeds went towards underwriting compensation except for those securities which had been purchased by reinvestments of distributions. FINRA claimed that the securities broker dealer’s conduct in this regard was violative of FINRA Rules 2010 and 2310(b)(4).

In addition, FINRA stated that prospectuses did not identify that restricted shares of the common stock of the real estate investment trust would be awarded to certain individuals associated with the securities broker dealer which would constitute an item of underwriting compensation. FINRA alleged that Cabot Lodge’s conduct in this regard was violative of FINRA Rules 2010, 2310(b)(3) and 5110(c). The Complaint stated that Cabot Lodge’s failure to comply stemmed from its failure to create and implement adequate supervision systems and written supervisory procedures aimed at complying with FINRA Rules 2310 and 5110. FINRA Department of Enforcement alleged that the securities broker dealer’s failure to supervise in this regard was violative of FINRA Rules 3110(a) and (b).

The Complaint also alleged that Cabot Lodge did not have an adequate basis to conclude that its recommendations to an elderly customer were appropriate given the customer’s investment profile. Allegedly, the non-traded real estate investment trust products were only appropriate for a small group of customers who were able to properly analyze the risks and who had the financial ability to take on the risks. FINRA indicated that the securities broker dealer advised HS – a seventy-two year old investor who only intended on taking moderate risk and who considered income a priority – to liquidate municipal bonds to make a $75,100.00 purchase in a non-traded real estate investment trust.

FINRA alleged that the investment recommended to HS posed a substantial risk concerning distributions and the issuer lacked any operating history. The Complaint stated that fifty-seven percent of HS’ liquid net worth was tied up in the non-traded real estate investment trust. Allegedly, the recommendation failed to be suitable given the customer’s investment objectives, existing holdings, risk tolerance and investment experience. FINRA Department of Enforcement alleged that Cabot Lodge’s conduct was violative of FINRA Rules 2010 and 2111.

The information contained herein has been obtained from reliable sources however may not be accurate and is not guaranteed by us. Readers are encouraged to undertake their own independent investigation and evaluation of the relevant facts. All claims and allegations are subject to adjudication, decisions may be subject to appeal, and no inference is intended, nor should any inference be made from any information contained herein from any source.

Questions or comments regarding the source or accuracy of any information, including any subsequent developments, should be directed to:  [email protected]

This posting and the information on our website is for general information purposes only. This content should be not considered legal advice, and any responses, comments, e-mails, other communications do not form any attorney client relationship. Attorney Advertisement. See Important Disclaimer.

Guiliano Law Group, P.C.

Our practice is limited to the representation of investors. Over the last three decades, we have recovered more than a hundred million dollars for more than 1,000 injured investors from all over the United States and several foreign countries. We accept representation purely on a contingent fee basis, meaning there is no cost to you unless we make a recovery for you. There is never any charge for a confidential consultation or an evaluation of your claim. For more information, contact us at (877) SEC-ATTY.

For more information concerning common claims against stockbrokers and investment professionals, please visit us at stockbrokerfraud.com

To learn more about FINRA Securities Arbitration, and the legal process, please visit us at securitiesarbitrations.com

Stockbroker Fraud. Securities Arbitration and Investment Fraud Lawyers.  
National Practice. Contingent Fee. Confidential Free Consultation.

 (877) SEC-ATTY

1700 Market Street, Suite 1005
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Direct: (215) 413-8223
Toll Free: (877) 732-2889

1260 South Soto Street, Suite 7
Los Angeles, California 90023
Direct: (213) 255-3475
Toll Free: (877) 732-2889

2750 NE 185th Street, Suite 302
Aventura, Florida 33180-2877
Direct: (786) 490-2413
Toll Free: (877) 732-2889

See Important Disclaimer

Tags:

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Name (required)

Email (will not be published) (required)

Website