Investors Sue First Standard For Fraud

money case 163495 1280 - Investors Sue First Standard For Fraud

Andre Pierre Davis of Red Bank New Jersey a stockbroker currently registered with First Standard Financial Company LLC is the subject of a customer initiated investment related arbitration claim where the customer sought $100,000.00 in damages based upon allegations that unsuitable transactions were executed and the customer’s account was churned. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Arbitration No. 18-02596 (July 30, 2018).

FINRA Public Disclosure reveals that Davis is referenced in eight additional customer initiated investment related disputes containing accusations of Davis’ violative conduct during the time that he was associated with First Standard Financial Company, Newbridge Securities Corporation and First Montauk Securities Corp. Specifically, on September 25, 2002, a customer filed an investment related complaint regarding Davis’ activities where the customer requested $11,000.00 in damages supported by allegations that Davis effected unauthorized over-the-counter equities trades in the customer’s account.

On April 14, 2004, another customer filed an investment related complaint involving Davis’ conduct in which the customer sought $22,470.00 in damages founded on accusations that misrepresentations had been made to the customer concerning corporate bond purchases. Then, a customer initiated investment related arbitration claim involving Davis’ conduct was resolved for $63,000.00 in damages based upon allegations that Davis failed to execute the customer’s stop loss order and traded in the customer’s account without authorization. FINRA Arbitration No. 09-05200 (Oct .11, 2011).

On May 10, 2010, another customer filed an investment related complaint concerning Davis’ activities where the customer requested $190,279.00 in damages supported by accusations that Davis put the customer in exchange-traded funds, stock and over-the-counter equities that were not appropriate for the customer. On October 5, 2010, a customer initiated investment related complaint regarding Davis’ activities was settled for $12,500.00 in damages founded on allegations that Davis misrepresented information about the customer’s investments, charged the customer commissions that were excessive; engaged in unapproved transactions in the customer’s account; and effected unsuitable exchange-traded fund and equity trades.

Moreover, a customer initiated investment related arbitration claim concerning Davis’ conduct was resolved for $135,000.00 in damages based upon accusations of the failure to follow the customer’s instructions; breach of fiduciary duty; churning; excessive commissions; misrepresentations; and unsuitable over-the-counter equity, stock and exchange-traded fund transactions. FINRA Arbitration No. 10-15704 (Oct. 12, 2011). Moreover, a customer initiated investment related arbitration claim regarding Davis’ activities was settled for $24,999.00 in damages supported by allegations that bad investment advice was provided to the customer concerning common and preferred stock investments. FINRA Arbitration No. 16-01793 (May 15, 2017).

Since March 8, 2000, Davis has been associated with seven different broker dealers, four of which have been expelled by securities regulators for violation of federal securities laws or are otherwise defunct.

The information contained herein has been obtained from reliable sources however may not be accurate and is not guaranteed by us. Readers are encouraged to undertake their own independent investigation and evaluation of the relevant facts. All claims and allegations are subject to adjudication, decisions may be subject to appeal, and no inference is intended, nor should any inference be made from any information contained herein from any source.

This posting and the information on our website is for general information purposes only. This content should be not considered legal advice, and any responses, comments, e-mails, other communications do not form any attorney client relationship. Attorney Advertisement. See Important Disclaimer

Guiliano Law Group

Our practice is limited to the representation of investors. Over the last three decades, we have recovered more than a hundred million dollars for more than 1,000 injured investors from all over the United States and several foreign countries. We accept representation purely on a contingent fee basis, meaning there is no cost to you unless we make a recovery for you. There is never any charge for a confidential consultation or an evaluation of your claim. For more information, contact us at (877) SEC-ATTY.

For more information concerning common claims against stockbrokers and investment professionals, please visit us at stockbrokerfraud.com

To learn more about FINRA Securities Arbitration, and the legal process, please visit us at securitiesarbitrations.com